apa past proceedings help contents 2002APAhome
     

Protecting Surface Water And Groundwater

Session: Protecting Surface Water And Groundwater Supplies

April 15, 4:00 PM

Daniel M. Blood, AICP, Moderator, Hillsborough County
Cece McKiernan,
Environmental Administrator, Watershed Management Florida DEP
Paula Dye, AICP,
Chief Environmental Planner, Tampa Bay Water
Lisa Kramer, AICP,
RLA, Senior Planner, Hillsborough County


ABSTRACT: The Tampa Bay Region on the west coast of Florida is developing new water supplies, which must be protected. Water source protection is a state, regional and local issue implemented through land use controls based on engineering, science and planning methods.


CROSS CUTTING THEMES OF PROTECTING SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER SUPPLIES

Hillsborough County, like many urban communities, has an evolved drinking water protection strategy, which stems from national, state and local policies. The Florida local government planning system model reinforces a need to link land and water management on a state, regional and local basis through wellhead protection and surface water protection measures. As a part of regional system of interconnected water supplies and with new water supplies coming on line from new groundwater and surface water sources, Hillsborough County is taking actions to address existing and future undesirable land uses which are threats to public drinking water supplies and sources.

The wellhead protection and surface water protection measures are based on an integration of water resources science, land planning methodologies, and seek an integrated policy approach. Groundwater modeling science is used to predict travel times, zones of influence and a basis for distance buffers for wells and well fields. Buffering methodologies are used to establish protection zones based on legal premises and community standards for protection of ground water sources and surface water sources. Decisions to not allow new land uses which are threats to sources are necessary.

The drinking water source protection strategy, which the County is using, is part of larger water resource management and protection policy. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection is using an overall watershed management approach for source water protection. Tampa Bay Water is providing regional data and technical assistance to local interests, which must protect drinking water resources. Hillsborough County is focusing on a ground water and surface water protection strategy through its Land Development Code.

FLORIDA LOOKS TO WATERSHED PLANNING TO IDENTIFY PRIORITY WATERSHED ISSUES

The Florida Water Plan is the Department of Environmental Protection’s principal planning tool for long-term protection of Florida’s water resources. Florida faces major water management challenges driven in large part by a population that is projected to increase from nearly 16 million in the year 2000 to about 20.7 million by 2020. The challenges include a projected increase in total fresh water use from about 7.2 billion gallons a day in 1995 to about 9.3 billion gallons a day in 2020; point and nonpoint source pollution from existing and ongoing development is impairing the quality of the state's surface waters; nitrate contamination threatens many of the state's major spring systems; continued development in high-risk, low-lying areas is increasing the potential for flooding to cause significant damage; water withdrawals to meet human needs are causing harm to natural systems; and, the most severe drought in Florida's recorded history is causing water shortages in many parts of the state. Potential solutions for these problems are increasingly controversial and expensive, but Florida's economic future and quality of life depend on how well we protect, manage, conserve, and reuse the state's water resources.

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection has determined that watershed management is the best available tool to better coordinate the various separate water programs created by different state and federal actions. It has become increasingly clear that these programs must be coordinated so that they are efficiently and effectively working on common priorities. The Watershed Approach aims to manage water resources on the basis of hydrologic units rather than arbitrary political or regulatory boundaries. Also important is the emphasis on involving basin stakeholders in a cooperative effort to define, prioritize, and resolve the basin's problems.

Waterbodies will be evaluated and Total Maximum Daily Loads (of pollutants) will be set to improve and/or protect impaired surface waters. The Tampa Bay area is one of five basin management units, which has been identified in the overall evaluation plan for Florida.

One of the main objectives in the Florida Water Plan is to assess and protect source waters from contamination. Due to the recent drought considerable reevaluation of current policies has occurred. In addition a state drought action plan has been developed and a Water Conservation Initiative, which explores ways to expand the role of water conservation, has been established. At the state level, the Source Water Assessment Program is being implemented to improve protection of source waters used for water supply, especially from the potential contamination associated with normal day-to-day activities of Florida's growing population and economy. Hillsborough County will be one of the first to be evaluated in the next couple years, due in part to the information generated from the county's ordinance.

Water quality threats and actions are primarily focused on drinking water sources, as tap water continues to be considered "safe" by the general public. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection has adopted regulations requiring source water protection to insure tap water is "safe". Florida Administrative Code chapter 62-521 outlines the requirements for wellhead protection areas and does not "discourage local governments from establishing more comprehensive or more stringent protection measures".

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Source Water Assessment Program is being implemented to improve protection of source waters used for water supply, especially from the potential contamination associated with normal day-to-day activities of Florida’s growing population and economy.

A consistent local wellhead protection strategy supports Florida’s Watershed program. With strong local restrictions and the leadership to enforce those restrictions, comprehensive protection can be achieved. Hillsborough County is a model to develop this approach because of data availability and past policy work. As previously mentioned, they are models for many statewide efforts. Land Development Code provisions are linking the source protection strategy to the statewide watershed protection strategy. Without incorporating this protection into the planning for future development, success is harder to achieve. Local county ordinances can bridge gaps in protection of source water supplies as the state continues to move toward basin and regional protection strategies.

REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AND THE INTERJURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE

Tampa Bay Water is a special district created by inter-local agreement among its member governments (Hillsborough County, Pasco County, Pinellas County, New Port Richey, St. Petersburg, and Tampa) to provide wholesale drinking water to its members, which in turn provide water to over 2 million people in the tri-county area. Tampa Bay Water currently relies on 12 regional groundwater facilities, two water treatment facilities, and a surface water augmentation facility to produce an average of 180 million gallons-per-day (mgd). However, new water supplies must be developed to accommodate permit reduction of 100 mgd at current groundwater facilities required by the Southwest Florida Water Management District, while still meeting the members’ water needs. The chart below shows the mandated permit cut-backs, as well as demands and new supplies over the 20-year planning period.

 

Tampa Bay Water is currently implementing the first phase of a Master Water Plan (MWP) that will provide 96 mgd of new drinking water supply to the region. Originally approved in 1995, the MWP combines new sources like seawater desalination and surface water with limited additional groundwater and aggressive conservation. In the fall of 2000, Tampa Bay Water began construction on the first phase of MWP projects, including the regional surface water and groundwater treatment plant. Other MWP projects being completed include: a 25-mgd seawater desalination facility; the Enhanced Surface Water System that will withdraw water from the Tampa Bypass Canal, Hillsborough and Alafia rivers for potable use, or storage in a new 15–billion gallon reservoir; the Brandon Urban Dispersed Wells Project; and three key interconnecting pipelines.

In June 2001, the Tampa Bay Water Board of Directors approved the next configuration of MWP projects that are expected to add 45-50 mgd to the regional system and meet member water supply needs through 2014. These MWP projects include: a 25-mgd Gulfcoast Seawater Desalination project to be located in northwest Pinellas or southwest Pasco County, the Cone Ranch Wellfield, Mid-Pinellas Brackish Water project, the Cypress Bridge II project, the Crystals International project, Eagles Wells project, and the Cargill Reclaimed Exchange project. One additional project, the Morris Bridge Sink, was also approved for emergency supply purposes. The map below shows Tampa Bay Water’s Master Water Plan.

Tampa Bay Water is also planning for future needs by evaluating water supply projects to meet demand in 2015 and beyond. Recently, a planning process including public meetings, a Planning Advisory Committee, and a Technical Advisory Committee, was used by Tampa Bay Water’s System Engineer (Black & Veatch), the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, and Tampa Bay Water staff to develop a list of more than 300 potential projects, project screening criteria, and a short-list of recommended projects for developmental study. In November 2001, Tampa Bay Water’s Board of Directors approved a developmental study project list for more detailed evaluations over the next year and a half.

I. WHY DO WE NEED TO UPDATE THE COUNTY WELLHEAD PROTECTION ORDINANCE?

Protection of groundwater and surface water resources to ensure a safe source of potable water supply is an ongoing concern to Hillsborough County, and other counties throughout the State. The federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as amended in 1986 established a new program for the States to delineate and manage Wellhead Protection Areas for the protection of public groundwater supplies. A subsequent amendment of the SDWA in 1996 requires each State to establish and implement a Source Water Assessment and Protection (SWAP) program. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has implemented a statewide wellhead protection (WHP) program (Chapter 62-521, F.A.C.). While the state government has statewide authority and responsibility in this resource protection (Chapter 9J-5), Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations Act requires local governments to protect wellfields and water resources through the implementation of land development regulations. State of Florida planning regulations require an Aquifer Recharge and Protection Element as part of the state mandated Comprehensive Plan. Hillsborough County’s current Comprehensive Plan has a set of policies which require protections of the public potable water supply wells and prescribes that threats to public potable water supply wells should be regulated through land use regulations and enforcement.

A wellhead protection ordinance and wellhead resource protection map was adopted by Hillsborough County in 1992 and was subsequently incorporated in the Hillsborough County Land Development Code (Part 3.05.00). Delineation of the Wellhead Resource Protection Areas (RPAs) that surrounded public potable water supply wells was performed by the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and presented to the Hillsborough County Board of Commissioners. Because new well fields have been constructed, cumulative wellhead pumping rates have changed since 1992, revised population projections and technological advances have been realized, a delineation update to the RPAs, and reviewing and updating Hillsborough County’s Land Development Code is warranted. In addition, protection considerations for surface water providing existing and future potable water demands needs to be considered when updating the county’s wellhead protection ordinance.

The issue is how to adequately protect the current and proposed water supply sources from contamination. Utilizing the state’s requirements for WHP and SWAP programs as guidelines and comparing Hillsborough County’s ordinance with surrounding local governments’ programs, current and proposed water supply sources can be protected for future generations by implementing rules that provide protection of water resources while maintaining economic prosperity.

Since 1992 when the first Wellhead Protection regulations were established in the County’s Land Development Code, Tampa Bay Water has planned and is constructing several new potable drinking water sources in Hillsborough County. These include the Brandon Urban Wellfield and surface water withdrawals from the Hillsborough River, Tampa Bypass Canal, and Alafia River at Bell Shoals. Tampa Bay Water has announced their intent to develop a desalinization plant along Tampa Bay and regional water supply reservoir adjacent to the Alafia River that can receive diverted high-stage flows primarily from the Hillsborough River, Tampa Bypass canal and Alafia River. Consequently, the objectives have been expanded to include the development of a policy and planning overlay to provide an acceptable level of planning and regulatory protection for potable surface water sources.

These new wells and surface water withdrawals are not currently covered by the County’s Wellhead Protection regulations in the Land Development Code. This project is to analyze the need for protection of these added public supply water wells and surface water withdrawals and propose any needed changes to the County’s Land Development Code.

The majority of water supply projects that are being proposed within the Tampa Bay Water service area in Hillsborough County. These projects represent long-term solutions to regional water supply problems and have high visibility. It can be reasonably expected that this project will develop a significant amount of press and controversy as regional water dynamics continue to play out. Citizen rights and property rights are in possible confrontation. The selection of a new Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), similar to the one formed in 1990, provides input on the proposed groundwater and surface water protection strategies, overlays and subsequent regulations.

The TAC is comprised of a broad-based group of stakeholders including a multidisciplinary interagency staff team, which has been assembled to support the update process and provide technical and professional expertise. Stakeholders include environmental and industrial interests, regulatory agencies, water suppliers, agricultural and development interests other county departments and citizen groups.

Additionally, community workshops, public forums and landowner participation is expected. Elected and appointed board endorsement is required through confidence and consensus building.

III. THE COUNTY’S APPROACH TO GROUND WATER AND SURFACE WATER PROTECTION

The wellhead protection and surface water protection measures are based on an integration of water resources science, land planning methodologies, and seek an integrated policy approach. Groundwater modeling science is used to predict travel times, zones of influence and a basis for distance buffers for wells and well fields. Decisions to not allow new land uses which are threats to sources are necessary.

Hillsborough County is focusing on a ground water and surface water protection strategy through its Land Development Code.

GROUNDWATER PROTECTION APPROACH

Groundwater Pollution Sources
Agricultural Sources
Animal feedlots
Intensive agriculture (crops, groves, herds, and aquaculture)
Chemical storage areas and containers
Residential Sources
Septic systems
Municipal Sources
Schools and government offices and grounds
Recreational Areas
Reclaimed water irrigation
Stormwater
Municipal waste landfills
Commercial Source
Airports, abandoned airfields
Auto repair shops/ Gasoline service stations
Country clubs / Golf clubs
Dry cleaners
Hardware/lumber/parts stores
Railroad tracks and yards
Scrap and junk yards
Above-ground and underground storage tanks
Industrial Sources
Waste tailing ponds (commonly for the disposal of mining wastes)
Above-ground and underground storage tanks and containers
Industrial Processes
Electric and electronic equipment manufacturers and storage facilities
Electoplaters
Foundaries and metal fabricators
Machine and metalworking shops
Mining operations (surface and underground), underground storage mines
Public utilities (phone, electric power, gas)
Wood preserving facilities

 

COMPARISON OF WELLHEAD PROTECTION APPROACHES
Basic Element Hillsborough County1 Pinellas County Plant City Polk County Manatee County
Prohibited Activities No new solid waste landfill, industrial land use, CAFO, dairy farm storage and treatment facilities, land applications of sludge and septage, USTs within 1,000 feet from wellhead, and no discharge of stormwater to areas with hydrologic connections to Floridan aquifer. The use, handling, production, disposal, and storage of any regulated substances associated with nonresidential activities are prohibited. No nonresidential discharge through natural or manmade conduits into either class G-1 or G-2 groundwater or causes violation of any water quality standards. Industrial stormwater discharges into retention/detention ponds, and new industrial discharge into groundwater that contains hazardous constituents are prohibited. No new industrial land use zoning, sanitary landfills, commercial or industrial septic disposal systems, interstate highway w/in _ mile radius of public supply wells and stormwater retention within this _ mile radius are prohibited. No new solid waste landfill, industrial land use, CAFO, dairy farm storage and treatment facilities, land applications of sludge and septage, USTs within 1,000 feet from wellhead, and no discharge of stormwater to areas with hydrologic connections to Floridan aquifer. Industrial activity that handles, utilizes, generates, or disposes of regulated substances, wastewater treatment plants or septic systems serving industrial activities, animal farms, CAFO, USTs, mining, well installations that do not meet construction requirements of Chapter 40D-3, FAC. are prohibited. No new sanitary landfills, phosphogypsum stacks, sludge or septage land applications, hazardous waste treatment, storage, or transfer facilities, injection wells. Within the primary zone of exclusion (200 feet radius from wellhead), no new commercial or industrial development, and no new septic systems or leaching fields. For both the primary and secondary zones of exclusion, sanitary landfills, facilities that handles, stores, or processes regulated substances, junkyard or salvage operations, mines, wastewater treatment plants, pesticide storage facilities, and animal feed lots are prohibited


The protection criteria was established as those existing or proposed public potable water supply wells with an average daily permitted pumping rate of > 100,000 gallons per day.

Groundwater flow modeling was preformed utilizing MODFLOW under steady-state conditions and simulated the 10-year capture zones with MODPATH. The TAC reached a consensus that utilizes the integrated surface and groundwater (ISGW) model data sets and output to create a refine grid model based on the ISGW data. The model was constructed with the most current hydrogeological data available and is presently the most detailed model developed for all of Hillsborough County. Results of the modeling were utilized in delineating the Resource Protection Areas.

Analysis of potential threats

 

COMPARISON EPA METHODS FOR DELINEATING WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS
Method Advantages Disadvantages
Using Geometric or Analytical Equations to assess:

1) Arbitrary Fixed Radius
2) Calculated Fixed Radius

  • Easily implemented
  • Inexpensive
  • Requires minimal expertise
  • Low hydrogeologic precision
  • Highly vulnerable aquifers may be underprotected
  • Highly susceptible to legal challenge
Using Analytical Methods (e.g., WhAEM2000) to assess:

1) Time of Travel
2) Drawdown
3) Hydrogeologic Boundaries

  • More accurate than fixed radius, because method is based on site-specific parameters
  • Various equations have been developed, allowing selection of solution that fits local conditions
  • Requires little input data as compared to numerical groundwater models
  • Does not accurately take into account hydrologic boundaries, aquifer heterogeneities, and local recharge effects
Using Numerical Methods (e.g., MODFLOW) to assess:

1) Time of Travel
2) Drawdown
3) Hydrogeologic Boundaries

  • Most accurate of all methods
  • Can be used for complex hydrogeologic conditions
  • Allows assessment of natural and human-related affects on the groundwater system for evaluating management optionss
  • High degree of hydrogeologic and modeling expertise required
  • Extensive aquifer data required
  • Most expensive method

 

SURFACE WATER PROTECTION APPROACH

 

Surface Water Pollution Sources
Agricultural Sources
Animal feedlots
Intensive agriculture (crops, groves, herds, and aquaculture)
Chemical storage areas and containers
Residential Sources
Septic systems
Municipal Sources
Schools and government offices and grounds
Recreational Areas
Reclaimed water irrigation
Stormwater
Municipal waste landfills
Commercial Source
Airports, abandoned airfields
Auto repair shops/ Gasoline service stations
Country clubs / Golf clubs
Dry cleaners
Hardware/lumber/parts stores
Railroad tracks and yards
Scrap and junk yards
Above-ground and underground storage tanks
Industrial Sources
Waste tailing ponds (commonly for the disposal of mining wastes)
Above-ground and underground storage tanks and containers
Industrial Processes
Electric and electronic equipment manufacturers and storage facilities
Electoplaters
Foundaries and metal fabricators
Machine and metalworking shops
Mining operations (surface and underground), underground storage mines
Public utilities (phone, electric power, gas)
Wood preserving facilities

 

SUMMARY COMPARISON OF NEARBY SURFACE WATER PROTECTION APPROACHE
Element City of Tampa Manatee County
Protection Areas The watershed of the Hillsborough River, from its headwaters to the Hillsborough River Dam. Watershed Protection Overlay District for the Evers and Manatee Reservoirs.
Prohibited Activities The dumping or discharging of sewage or industrial wastes into the Hillsborough River or its tributaries. The construction, reconstruction, extension, increasing the capacity or volume, or alteration of any sewage disposal device within 200 feet form the mean high water mark or for any facility that directly or indirectly discharges into the Hillsborough River, or any of its tributaries. The introduction of any objectionable substance in such quantity that special purification methods will be required. Storage area for hazardous materials w/in either 100-year floodplain or w/in 200 feet of any inflowing watercourses, disposal of effluent or sludge, new CAFOs, new asphalt and concrete plants, clay settling ponds, septic tanks
Restricted Activities N/A Any project which generates wastewater shall use public sanitary sewer system; industrial, mining, and major earthmoving activities; industrial waste; septic tanks only for isloated single family dwellings with a setback of 500 feet from the high water mark or 50 feet from the stream valley, whichever is greater, no agricultural or land development activites shall dispose of or store hazardous materials in excess of 220#s or acutely hazardous material in excess of 2.2#s per month, no nonpoint source that would violate applicable Federal, State, and local standards, landfills, wastewater treatment plants, aviation facilities, new residential projects shall have 35% open space, new non-residential projects shalll have 30% open space.
Exemptions N/A N/A
Permit Process N/A N/A
Code Reference City of Tampa Charter, Part B Related Laws, Section 21.20 Land Development Code, Chapter 6, Section 604

Existing Riverine Polices in the Comprehensive Plan were evaluated in the analysis of Surface water protection approaches. The polices are below:

Riverine Corridor Overlay (RCO) District: This district is comprised of the 25-year floodplain for designated riverine corridors within Urban Level land use categories. RCO Districts are established pursuant to the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Industrial land uses are prohibited. Refer to the land use map to locate RCO districts. The provisions of this district do not apply to parcels of land for single family dwellings where the parcel is exempt from the provisions of the Hillsborough County Subdivision Regulations or where the parcel is part of a recorded plat on January 28, 1988.

Designated Rivers and Creeks in the RCO District: The following rivers and creeks designated in the RCO district as shown on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map:

  1. Cypress Creek (tributary of the Hillsborough River
  2. Trout Creek (tributary of the Hillsborough River
  3. Cowhouse Creek (tributary of the Hillsborough River
  4. Hillsborough River
  5. Alafia River
  6. Bullfrog Creek (that portion north of Big Bend Road

Surface water protection of the Hillsborough and Alafia Rivers propose to use the 100-year flood zone along the major tributaries. The 100-year flood zone is defined by FEMA, currently available in GIS, and is already used as a regulatory tool.

Buffering methodologies were used to establish protection zones based on legal premises and community standards for protection of ground water sources and surface water sources. The delineated buffers used _ and 1/16 section line to establish a minimum of 1/16 buffer. Buffering methodologies were used to establish protection zones based on legal premises and community standards for protection of ground water sources and surface water sources. The delineated buffers used _ and 1/16 section line to establish a minimum of 1/16 buffer.

5 Part Package for implementation:

Comprehensive Plan Policies
Land Development Code –Updated Ordinance
LDC Defintiions
Water Resource Protection Area Map
Development Review Procedures Manual
WELLHEAD AND WATER RESOURCE ORDINANCE REGULATORY STRUCTURE
ACTIVITIES PERMIT TYPE DRPM ACTION APPEAL PROCESS
NEW PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES
Prohibited activities

SPECIAL USE PERMIT REVIEW BY LUHO

NATURAL RESOURCES REVIEW BOARD
EXISTING PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES
Prohibited activities listed above which already exist
OPERATING PERMIT

CLOSURE PERMIT

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW LAND USE HEARING OFFICER
EXPANSIONS OF PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES
Expansions of prohibited activities listed above
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REVIEW BY LUHO NATURAL RESOURCES REVIEW BOARD
ACTIVITIES PERMIT TYPE DRPM ACTION APPEAL PROCESS
Identified new & existing restricted activities OPERATING PERMIT

CLOSURE PERMIT

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW LAND USE HEARING OFFICER
ACTIVITIES PERMIT TYPE DRPM ACTION APPEAL PROCESS
Exempted NO PERMIT REQUIRED N/A N/A

PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

  1. Discharge into groundwater that causes a violation in the water quality standards.
  2. Discharges to wells and sinkholes that allow direct contact groundwater
  3. Industrial stormwater discharges to retention/detention ponds.
  4. Discharge of stormwater into depressions with direct or demonstrated hydrologic connection to the Floridan aquifer system.
  5. New industrial land use.
  6. New solid waste disposal facility.
  7. Industrial septic tank disposal systems.
  8. New underground storage facilities and above ground storage facilities shall be prohibited within a distance of 500 feet from a public potable water supply wells.
  9. Any new land applications of domestic sludge and domestic septage.
  10. New Interim wastewater treatment plants.
  11. New concentrated animal feeding operations.
  12. New Dairy Farm
  13. New mining operations.
  14. Land application of industrial waste water and industrial reuse water.
RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES
  1. Domestic and industrial Wastewater Treatment Plants
  2. Intensive Animal agriculture
  3. Aquaculture
  4. Pet Cemeteries
  5. Construction and Demolition Debris
  6. Dry Cleaning Plants
  7. Excavations
  8. Firing Ranges
  9. Furniture Finishing and Repair
  10. Public and Private Stables
  11. Heavy Manufacturing
  12. Manufacturing Processing and Assembly
  13. Hazardous Waste facilities
  14. Junkyards
  15. Land Excavations
  16. Public Utility Refueling Facilities
  17. New Subdivisions Using Septic Tanks as onsite wastewater disposal systems with lot sizes less than one acre.

GENERAL EXEMPTIONS

  1. Continuous Transit
  2. Vehicular Fuel and Lubricant Use
  3. Use of Nitrates Contained in Fertilizers
  4. Janitorial Uses
  5. Construction Activities
  6. Laboratory or Instrument Use
  7. Retail Sales Activity
  8. Application of Pesticides, Herbicides, Fungicides, and Rodenticides
  9. Office Uses
  10. Residential Uses
  11. Utilities

Author and Copyright Information

Copyright 2002 by author

Daniel M. Blood, AICP, Moderator
is the project director for update of the wellhead protection and surface water protection of new water supplies in Hillsborough County, one of series of projects in linking land and water management. Mr. Blood may be reached at bloodd@hillsboroughcounty.org

CeCe McKiernan
is the Program Administrator for Watershed Management with the state of Florida Department of Environmental Protection’s Southwest District. She manages the District Staff who provide the technical and scientific support, including water quality and geologic analysis, GIS/GPS, Total Maximum Daily Load development and land use review, to the various District Program areas. Ms. McKeirnan may be reached at CeCe.McKiernan@dep.state.fl.us

Paula Dye, AICP
is the Chief Environmental Planner for Tampa Bay Water. Tampa Bay Water is the largest wholesale water supply agency in the State of Florida providing 180 million gallons of water each day to its six member governments and their 2 million customers in the Tampa Bay region. Paula Dye has been with Tampa Bay Water since 1997 where she is responsible for the design and management of the agency’s long-term water supply planning program. Ms. Dye may be reached at dye@tampbaywater.org

Lisa Kramer, AICP, RLA
has twelve years of experience as a registered landscape architect and certified planner. She is project manager for the Wellhead Protection Update for the county’s Land Development Code as an environmental community planning assignment. Ms. Kramer may be reached at kramerl@hillsboroughcounty.org.