Greenways:
|
|
|
Heather E. McCartney, AICP and Judy Lorenzo
|
© & Author Info |
When local planners participate in the implementation of a Corridor Management Plan, amazing and often pleasant surprises begin to emerge. In many corners of our state, small communities are being re-energized. It might be with the help of a multi-use rest area - visitor center born by a public-public and private partnership. It could be a viewpoint overlooking a wildlife viewing area, understanding of how wetland mitigation and wildlife corridors impact highway safety, or it might be providing some historical or geological context to visitors on the route. The byway may highlight the "pearl" of each community, thereby creating a string of unforgettable memories.
Viewed in the larger context, suddenly jurisdictional boundaries fade and the corridor is the thread that weaves through many patchworks of local land use, creating the harmony that supports common goals and multiples the benefits yielded from the bridges constructed.. Some of these bridges are for motor or pedestrian travel, while the majority of the human connections are invisible to the eye. They are the backbone of a strong community, strong visions, and the makings for strong citizen involvement and cooperation - they are the bridges of trust, communication and partnership.
In last millennium transportation corridors were our rivers. Then with the advent of rail and later the automobile, our railroads and highways naturally followed banks along the rivers. Corridor management evaluates attributes beyond the highway and right-of-way. It often includes the very fish bearing rivers and adjacent upland forests we so diligently try to plan for in our local comprehensive plans as we examine many elements, evaluate their inter-relationships, and balance competing interests.
The public wants to participate more actively and to have their input considered.. They need to know, as we are all so aware, that the "planner" is really listening and including their input in reports, documents and actions. Citizens want to provide their input in a in a variety of ways, not just at meetings. However, facilitating citizen input and having it weighed equally across traditional boundaries of county lines and city limits continues to be a challenge.
Highways are the most common corridor that introduces our community and create the first and lasting impression of our towns. Through this window we don't often see the most significant, unique or beautiful attributes our scenic communities have to offer. Community planners are struggling to maintain or create unique community identities, rather than letting them become "strip highway" - an America with the ubiquitous corporate gas stations, fast foods, chain motels, strip commercial, regional banks and used car/RV lots. Often the only way to reach our destination of scenic views, is to drive highways with a barrage of electronic signs competing for our tourist dollar. We numb ourselves into a catatonic state in order to survive this chaos. Once through the strip highways we can actually feel ourselves relax and stress is relieved. But it takes an effort to promote "softening connections".
Can a greenway's corridor strategies help establish identities that differentiate communities while linking them together into a string of pearls, to tell an interesting regional story? We think this is possible, since each city or town has an identity, shaped by intrinsic values in the natural landscape and from a history of human settlement. By identifying the important values or attributes the community determines how to preserve or enhance these assets and then must visually present these attributes to both residents, businesses and visitors. Knowing the unique attributes along our communities and byway, also helps to draw us closer to the beauty and history of the area, and allows us to belong to the community and to express our concerns about stewardship.
Most of the communities along the corridors chosen for this paper need stronger economic bases, and an ability to maintain and attract new businesses, residents and tourists. The citizens from these communities have also chosen to approach the corridor management process through citizen initiatives (grass roots organizing) versus the approach taken by the well know Mountains to Sound Greenway effort that was organized through political and business leaders.
Each greenway effort is unique in how it is being accomplished. Thus it is hard to replicate another using the same blueprint. The process requires a strong commitment to the concept, not unlike other planning and public involvement processes. The benefits of bringing residents together to consider the broader needs of the region and to consider the similar issues and values, has greater benefits and lasting value. Towns along the corridors are trying to set design standards and signs regulations that will allow their town to redevelop gracefully. This is often necessary when the stakes are so high in order to attract the tourist industry. However, we feel the effort is well worth the lengthy process that takes planners out of our singular community perspective and forces us to broaden our technical skills and vision of planning.
The most successful partnerships create and maintain a balance between private property owner's rights and concerns, the continued operation of extractive resource companies (timber, mining and energy), state and federal resource management agencies responding to political, constituent or user needs, advocacy or tourism groups, local governmental jurisdictions, and the public-at-large. The concept of partnerships has become more common place in achieving community goals and a way to bring more rewarding and long lasting results. The bridges to successful partnerships are trust and communication. This is the bridge for planning in the new millennium.
The two featured greenways have encouraged cooperation of communities along their routes, and addressed special interest needs. Both efforts have had to address multi-county issues that span both sides of the Cascade Mountains, in rapidly growing areas north and south of Seattle, in addition to the agriculturally based foothills in Eastern Washington.
Both corridors are feeling the impacts of rapid development and the need to diversify their economic base through increased tourism. The citizen boards also are having to wrestle with increasing travel demand on these routes and the widening of these highways for safety and capacity reasons. Will the choices be limited? Will widening damage the traveling experience that is afforded by a two lane road?
Both the Mather Memorial Parkway and Stevens Pass Greenway are suffering from traffic congestion within communities. Until recently the Department of Transportation would only address capacity by widening or bypassing communities. While the smaller communities along the corridors are also trying to figure out how to capture some of the tourism dollar flowing by them on a daily basis, they are also trying to reduce sign clutter and the indiscriminate growth of subdivisions out into their rural communities. This may appear to some residents to be conflicting goals, but in fact they come into sync when tourism is put into the mix of goals. Tourism in the Pacific Northwest is based on our natural beauty and interesting history and quality built environments will determine whether tourism can be sustained.
Another challenge facing small communities is the need to get involved in corridor management when often they do not have a staff planner. Then, if the town is able to afford one planner, their time is taken up with current planning/development review. A concerted effort by board members and by town representatives to be actively involved can help bridge this gap.
Creating a non-profit group and developing a Corridor Management Plan typically takes several years. This stymies the groups momentum since it is hard to identify projects citizens can participate in early-on in order to show successes. Early success generates the momentum needed to get community residents involved and committed to tackle the more difficult problems. There is one very important item to remember, these advocacy groups have no regulator powers and no on going source of funding. These their strength lies in partnering with local communities and helping to access state funding.
Greenway advocacy groups also have to be savvy enough to know how write grant applications. Often the greenway advocacy groups do not have paid staff. Since the small communities don't typically have experienced staff in grants writing, the advocacy group needs to be able to handle these tasks as a partner.
When professional planners are involved on an on-going basis with the corridor management planning process, it is more likely that community plans will sync up with comprehensive plan, regulatory code and capital efforts. But, don't sit back and hope you will be extended an invitation to participate in your local effort, find out what is happening, contact the advocacy group, express an interest and get involved.
Heather E. McCartney, AICP
Planning Director, City of Mukilteo, WA
Stevens Pass Greenway Boardmember and Former President
4480 Chennault Beach Road
Mukilteo, WA 98275
(425) 355-4141, ex. 226
Fax (425) 347-4544
email: hmccartney@ci.mukilteo.wa.us
Judy Lorenzo
Washington State Heritage Corridors Program Manager
WA State Department of Transportation
POB 47393
Olympia, WA 98504-7393
(360) 705-7274
Fax (360) 705-6839
email: lorenzj@wsdot.wa.gov