Simulation of the Carefree radiant house


Original HAP peak load calculations
:
Because no software was available in 1995 to determine the peak load for a radiant panel system working within a heavy mass house, the peak loads were calculated using the Carrier HAP software for a conventional convective system. The results showed the need for a 4-ton unit and a peak total daily requirement for 51 ton-hours of cooling. Because the thermal mass was expected to dampen the peak, the homeowner/builder decided to use a nominal 3-ton ground source heat pump with 600-feet of ground loop. The loop capacity proved insufficient for cooling in the 1999 and 2000 seasons and in May of 2001, a closed loop evaporative fluid cooler was installed. With this added heat rejection, the capacity of the 3-ton heat pump has been boosted to that of a 4 ton unit.

BLAST, IBLAST, DOE2 and EnergyPlus:
Over the years, other simulation tools were used by thesis students to simulate the Carefree house. Here is an overview of that work. The earliest student thesis project related to the Carefree house, and before the house was completed, used BLAST to simulate the radiant system. No performance data was available with which to compare and calibrate. A student thesis project using DOE-2 simulated the house using a conventional air conditioning system with an air cooled condenser then compared the results with actual performance data from the house (He 2001). A student thesis project used IBLAST to simulate the radiant system and compared the results with the actual performance of the house (Pande 2001). This was done in collaboration with the developer of IBLAST. Two students recently used Energy Plus to simulate the radiant system and compare the results with the actual performance of the house. One student (Ghatti 2002) modeled the house during the passive periods, while a second student (Lathey 2002) modeled the radiant system operation during a cooling season. The passive results indicate that EnergyPlus predicts various surface temperatures, air temperatures and operative temperatures of the residence within 1-3°F compared to that of observed data. In attempting to validate the active radiant system however, program limitations were discovered and are the subject of another paper. Future releases of EnergyPlus should be able to rectify some of the problems identified during the course of this evaluation.

 

Thesis Abstracts


COMPARING RADIANT AND CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
DURING A COOLING SEASON

By
Xin He

Abstract:

This study compared the measured performance of a radiant cooling ceiling system with detailed simulations of a conventional forced air system during a cooling season in a Carefree, Arizona residence. Thermal comfort, cooling energy consumption (both off-peak and on-peak), peak demands and peak time of the residence for the radiant cooling ceiling system and for the conventional forced air system were compared. Cooling energy costs were compared using various utility rate structures.

A simulation study methodology for evaluating different systems was developed and explained in detail. PowerDOE simulation software was used to model various cases with conventional forced air systems. Simulation results were compared against the operational data collected from the Carefree house, in which a hydronic radiant ceiling system had been used for cooling.

Overall, for this case under study, the radiant ceiling system consumes less energy than the forced air system when an equal level of thermal comfort is maintained. The radiant ceiling system is more advantageous when used in combination with thermal mass and temperature setback control. Further cooling energy cost reduction can be achieved in addition to energy savings by the radiant ceiling system when utility companies offer Time-of-Day rates, as the radiant ceiling system uses less on-peak energy than the forced air system.







Carefree House

Objective

Project Description

Construction Photos


Data

Performance

Animation

Environmental control

Simulation

Conclusions & Observations

Future Work

Acknowledgements

References


Atascadero

 


PASSIVE PERFORMANCE OF A HIGH-MASS RESIDENCE:
ACTUAL DATA VS. ENERGYPLUS SIMULATION

By

Vinay Ghatti
Abstract:

Thermal simulation programs enable designers to explore a wide variety of options to make buildings more energy efficient and play a vital role in exploring answers to "what if" questions during the design of a building. Using appropriate simulation tools, design solutions can be investigated before taking up the expensive proposition of actually constructing the buildings. The quest for an ideal simulation tool, to address divergent needs of building design and analysis, has led to the development of a new tool, EnergyPlus. Based on the popular features and capabilities of BLAST® and DOE-2®, EnergyPlus has many new features, such as variable time steps, integrated heat-and-mass balance-based zone simulation and multi-zone airflow. An integrated solution technique enables EnergyPlus to predict accurate space temperatures and surface temperatures, which are crucial to energy efficient system design like system size, plant size and occupant comfort and health.

This research explores the capabilities of EnergyPlus to predict the sailing season performance by comparing the actual data recorded at a high-mass residence at Carefree, Arizona, with the simulated results using EnergyPlus, for two sets of data recorded during fall 2000 and spring 2001. The research compares the various data elements recorded at the site, namely interior and exterior surface temperatures, interior air and operative and mean radiant temperatures, with that of simulated results. The study was conducted by creating a custom weather file, which was modified from the original Phoenix TMY2 file by replacing the essential data with that of actual data recorded at the site. The results indicate that EnergyPlus predicts various surface temperatures, air temperatures and operative temperatures of a passive high-mass residence within an average accuracy of 1-3°F compared to that of the observed data. Although the temperature trend predicted by EnergyPlus closely matches the actual data, the temperature lag predicted by EnergyPlus tends to consistently deviate from the observed data by 1 to 2 hours. The study requires further analysis using experimentally derived material properties and an accurate solar-radiation data in weather file to enhance the accuracy of the simulation model.

OPTIMIZING THE AMOUNT OF THERMAL MASS FOR A ARIZONA RESIDENCE
WITH RADIANT COOLING USING ENERGYPLUS

By

Vasudha Lathey

Abstract:

Low temperature radiant cooling systems are generating a lot of interest among energy and HVAC professionals. The ability to predict the effectiveness and the energy efficiency of these systems has been a long-standing goal for designers. These studies have been limited by the absence of simulation tools capable of accurately analyzing these systems. An accurate analysis of such systems requires the accurate prediction of the transient nature of the combined radiant and convective heat transfer processes. A simulation tool called EnergyPlus, aimed at incorporating all of these characteristics, is under development at the University of Illinois and was used for this study.


The performance data of an instrumented residence using radiant panels was used in an attempt to validate the simulation capabilities of EnergyPlus. The building under study is a high mass residence in Carefree, Arizona that uses a hydronic radiant cooling system embedded in the ceiling and the floor. The focus of the study was to identify the heat transfer processes taking place within the house. The aim was to establish the radiative, convective and conductive processes taking place at each surface of the residence -- the walls, floor, glass, etc. After the affect of the radiative and convective heat transfers processes was quantified, this information was to be used to determine the optimum amount of thermal mass for this system in the house.
The successful completion of the study relied on the successful validation of EnergyPlus and its capacity to simulate radiant systems. This was to be achieved by the comparison of simulation results with the data collected on site. The study revealed that EnergyPlus has good potential to become a powerful tool for analyzing radiant systems. In its current stage of development, EnergyPlus was able to predict the passive performance of the house but it was unable to model the radiant system accurately. At this stage in its development, EnergyPlus is not able to incorporate the control strategies defined by the user. Thus, the full study could not be completed but the work did identify some important limitations in the tool, and put forward recommendations that would be useful for the further development of EnergyPlus.

 


Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents 2002 | ASU Privacy Statement